{ object_type: 'Exhibit Item',embed_type: 'image',embed_detail: 'http://www.myloc.gov/_assets/Exhibitions/naacp/worldwarii/Assets/na0099p1_th125.jpg',embed_alt: 'Supreme Court Decisions against Segregation',thumbnail: {url: 'http://www.myloc.gov/_assets/Exhibitions/naacp/worldwarii/Assets/na0099p1_th125.jpg',alt: 'Supreme Court Decisions against Segregation',height: '66',width: '125'} }

See Silverlight version of this item » About this item        

The Legal Defense Fund waited twelve years to pursue two precedent-setting cases before the Supreme Court. In 1946 the University of Texas Law School denied entry to Herman Sweatt and proposed a makeshift law school for him in the basement of a building near all-black Prairie View University. In 1948 George McLaurin, a teacher, applied to the University of Oklahoma to pursue his doctorate. The university admitted McLaurin, but segregated him from white students. The Court also considered another case, Henderson v. United States, which involved segregated dining cars on interstate trains. On June 5, the Court ruled in favor of all three plaintiffs. In Sweatt and McLaurin, the Court held that intangible factors could create educational inequality. These factors included the Texas Law School’s reputation, faculty, and alumni network. The Court’s decisions in these cases weakened the structure of legalized segregation.
The Legal Defense Fund waited twelve years to pursue two precedent-setting cases before the Supreme Court. In 1946 the University of Texas Law School denied entry to Herman Sweatt and proposed a makeshift law school for him in the basement of a building near all-black Prairie View University. In 1948 George McLaurin, a teacher, applied to the University of Oklahoma to pursue his doctorate. The university admitted McLaurin, but segregated him from white students. The Court also considered another case, Henderson v. United States, which involved segregated dining cars on interstate trains. On June 5, the Court ruled in favor of all three plaintiffs. In Sweatt and McLaurin, the Court held that intangible factors could create educational inequality. These factors included the Texas Law School’s reputation, faculty, and alumni network. The Court’s decisions in these cases weakened the structure of legalized segregation.